On February 3, 2023, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granted MetLife’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim in Collins et al v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. In granting MetLife’s motion to dismiss, the Court reinforced both the filed-rate doctrine and the requirement for plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies before turning to the judicial process.
The Plaintiffs in this case, who were citizens of Missouri and Illinois, brought suit against MetLife for recovery of premiums paid for inflation protection under long-term care insurance policies. Plaintiffs had purchased a “5% Automatic Compound Inflation Protection Rider” (Inflation Rider), which contained a clause stating that the insured’s benefit will “automatically increase each year with no corresponding increase in premiums.” Plaintiffs claimed that after purchasing this product, their annual base premiums doubled in amount, and thus alleged that MetLife made fraudulent misrepresentations and concealed material facts about the effect of the inflation Rider on their premiums.
Continue reading “Court Reinforces the Filed-rate Doctrine in Collins et al v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.“