Tax-Qualified Language: Litigation Risks Stemming from Common Policy Language

Many long-term-care (LTC) insurance policies in the market are “Tax-Qualified,” or “TQ,” meaning that they meet the federal standards for favorable tax treatment specified by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) (or were grandfathered in to that definition). This is an attractive option for most insureds because under TQ policies, certain LTC insurance benefits qualify for favorable federal income tax treatment — if the policy pays only benefits that reimburse the insured for qualified LTC costs, the insured will not owe federal income tax on those benefits. Likewise, premiums are tax-deductible up to a maximum limit that increases with age. These benefits are not provided by policies that are “Non-Tax-Qualified,” or “NTQ.”

Congress included provisions concerning LTC insurance within HIPAA in an attempt to improve access to private LTC insurance. In doing so, however, Congress created some confusion for both insureds and insurers. For instance, in order to qualify as a TQ policy, the policy must contain a multitude of statutorily required provisions and language. Specifically, TQ policies must provide coverage for “qualified long-term care services,” which “are required by a chronically ill individual, and are provided pursuant to a plan of care prescribed by a licensed health care practitioner.” 26 U.S.C. § 7702B(c)(1). The term “chronically ill” is defined as “any individual who has been certified by a licensed health care practitioner as—

(i) being unable to perform (without substantial assistance from another individual) at least 2 activities of daily living for a period of at least 90 days due to a loss of functional capacity … or

READ THE FULL ARTICLE IN THE SOA LONG-TERM CARE NEWS.

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

About the Author: Nolan Tully

Nolan Tully advocates for insurance and financial services clients facing challenges in various aspects of their businesses. Nolan assists life, long-term care and disability insurers as well as annuity issuers with product development, regulatory compliance, and dispute resolution and litigation. Visit Nolan's bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

About the Author: Sandra K. Jones

Sandra Jones partners with insurance industry clients to address and resolve legal and regulatory challenges, as well as coverage and claims disputes that may be impeding their businesses. Visit Sandra's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

About the Author: Jessica E. Loesing

Jessica Loesing is a member of the firm's insurance practice group with experience in the life, disability, long-term care, and property and casualty sectors, as well as the financial services area. Visit Jessica's full bio on the Faegre Drinker website.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

©2024 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Privacy Policy